Mneme Law turns black-letter rules, case holdings and your own outline into cards that resurface exactly when you're about to forget them. Twenty minutes a day, then you're done.
What makes a promise supported by consideration?
Tap to reveal, then grade yourselfClear the queue and the app closes. That's the whole deal.
You understood the rule against perpetuities in October. Whether you can still state it in April is a different question — and that gap is a scheduling problem, not an intelligence one.
Recall a rule just as it starts to fade and the curve resets flatter, so the next interval can be longer. Every dot on the chart is one short review.
You don't need more hours in the library. You need better-timed ones.
Built around the way doctrinal courses actually assess you.
Elements, exceptions, majority and minority positions, and the case that settled it — written the way you'd state it on an exam, not the way a hornbook explains it.
Every answer moves a card along its own interval and tightens as finals approach. One list across all your courses.
Miss a card and Explain walks the distinction — the split, the policy behind it, a worked IRAC paragraph. Ask follow-ups until it holds.
Paste your outline or a page of class notes and Mneme turns it into cards on the same schedule — so your professor's emphasis, not a stranger's, is what you drill.
Retention by subject and by doctrine, so you know personal jurisdiction is solid and future interests are not — before the practice exam tells you.
The point of a schedule isn't to fill it. When the queue is empty the app says so and closes — no streak guilt, no "one more deck," no notification at 11pm telling you a stranger studied longer than you.
Finish the queue and you get a closing screen, not another suggestion.
Cards work one-handed and offline, so the subway counts as studying.
Tell it your exam dates and it redistributes the load instead of dumping it on you.
"Studied the same way for two years. The difference was when, not how much."